CA-led cybersecurity & data protection

Compliance that stands up to an audit and an attack.

MERA KAVACH combines Chartered Accountant-led governance, Indian regulatory readiness and hands-on security implementation for organisations that cannot afford superficial compliance.

No generic checklistNo software sales pitchPractical exposure view
MERA KAVACH / CONTROL SIGNALACTIVE
DataIdentitySystemsVendorsAIGovernance
Business leaders reviewing cybersecurity, privacy and data-governance risks with a professional advisor
DPDP ACT 2023CERT-InISO/IEC 27001ISO/IEC 42001NIST CSF 2.0

Framework references indicate advisory alignment and service capability. They do not imply endorsement by authorities or standards bodies.

Threat reality

Exposure rarely stays inside one department.

Identity, data, vendors, recovery and employee decisions interact. This build publishes no unverified headline statistics; every external fact must trace to a current authoritative source.

01

Governance gap

Responsibility is unclear, so decisions, escalation and evidence arrive late.

02

Control gap

A policy exists, but access, recovery, deletion or monitoring has not been tested.

03

AI visibility gap

Teams use public AI before approved data boundaries and permissions exist.

MERA KAVACH Framework

From exposure to operating discipline.

A serious methodology: Know, Assess, Validate, Correct and Hold.

Know

Map data, people, systems, vendors, obligations and dependencies.

Assess

Identify regulatory, technical, contractual, operational and human risk.

Validate

Test whether policies, configurations, backups and workflows work.

Correct

Implement proportionate, risk-ranked improvements with accountable owners.

Hold

Monitor, train, review, test and improve continuously.

DimensionWhat is capturedManagement evidence
InputsInterviews, records, architecture, contracts, incidents and dependenciesApproved scope and source register
ActivitiesMapping, risk analysis, testing, remediation and trainingTest records, decisions and exception approvals
OutputsRisk view, control set, action plan and evidence registerNamed owners, due dates and review criteria
ReviewEvent-driven checks plus planned management reviewMinutes, metrics, incidents and improvement actions
Representative scenarios

Engagement structures, not invented client claims.

Each scenario remains clearly illustrative until replaced with approved client evidence.

ILLUSTRATIVE ENGAGEMENT

SaaS DPDP readiness

Challenge: enterprise diligence without a dependable data map.

Approach: map processes and processors; establish rights, retention and evidence ownership.

Example deliverables: data map, processor review, response workflow and roadmap.

ILLUSTRATIVE ENGAGEMENT

MSME cyber hardening

Challenge: limited visibility over critical accounts, endpoints and recovery.

Approach: prioritise identity, endpoint baselines, backup testing and incident preparation.

Example deliverables: control baseline, exception register and recovery evidence.

ILLUSTRATIVE ENGAGEMENT

AI governance

Challenge: public AI adoption without approved data or vendor boundaries.

Approach: map use, classify information, assess vendors and constrain actions.

Example deliverables: use policy, model register, risk review and approvals.

A practical first step

Find the gaps before an auditor, attacker, client or regulator does.

The first discussion identifies scope, urgency and the right next action. It is not a software sale.